They are two concepts that I think could use further discussion in this class. The first would be Truth Tables! I feel like this has not a lot to do with Critical thinking and more with math! But I know that they go hand in hand but I just do not fully get it! The last one that I think needs to be disused further or explained to me better is the Asirstotelian Logic. I do not get Asirstotelian Logic and I do not think I ever will get Asirstotelian Logic. I know it may seem a little harsh but I just do not get these to things I do not get how to use them properly and how to apply them the right way. Maybe next time there could be some way to present them better or maybe have the them just thrown out?? I do not know all that I do know is that me and Asirstotelian Logic and Truth Tables did not get along!
I agree with you with the Asirstotelian logic. It is very confusing. I hate the books explanations and how they use the theory of if S then P things. It is very confusing and is not easy comprehend. Their examples aren't very helpful either; I think it just confuses me even more. I don't know, maybe it's just me. I remember back in the early chapters, there was another concept that had the same forms of examples and concept type explanations with the if A then B then C. That was pretty confusing too. You’re right, you and I probably won’t ever understand this concept as well as we should.
ReplyDelete